Labels

August 10, 2019

A Rather 'On The Nose' Critique of the Concept of Absolute Freedom

Prompt: Your Choice. Write about anything.

    You know, I find it kinda funny that this post is promptless, as it means that I’m allowed 
to write anything that I want but, unfortunately, nothing comes to me. “Anything” is not exactly 
specific, and, as it would turn out, I kind of need things to be a bit more specific; I think we all 
do to be honest. It reminds me of a lot of the drama that has been happening in the video game 
industry: companies promising massive worlds and universes, with limitless possibilities and 
complete freedom; and yet this hasn’t gone very well, with No Man’s Sky and Fallout 76 being a 
couple of painful, relatively recent examples. Complete freedom is all well and good, but is that 
really what we want? No matter how big a game is, no matter how many mechanics, there are 
still only so many possibilities. Perhaps this is why Minecraft is so successful: because it is 
simple. 
This doesn’t just apply to video games either; this applies very heavily to real life. The 
fact that religions exist proves this point. There are so many deities to explain why we’re all 
here, so many deities to explain what we should do.
Philosophy is the art of finding meaning in reality, of coming up with a purpose. Why do 
we need it? Don’t we want freedom? Don’t we want to be able to do whatever we please? Ah, 
but are we even free to choose precisely what it is that we please? Are the desires we feel not 
simply impulses, driven by biological instinct? The desire to live? The desire for sex? The desire 
for food, and water, and shelter, and air? The desire for the instant stimulation that video games 
provide us? The desire for happiness?
We do not control the presence of these impulses, though we can resist and defy them. 
By merely existing, we are not truly free. Be glad for that.   

Word Count: 323

No comments:

Post a Comment